Luciano Darderi vs Franco Agamenone Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent form of both players, Agamenone appears to have a slight edge in some areas. With Agamenone winning 46.17% of their second serve points and Darderi slightly ahead with 50.9%, this metric suggests Darderi might have a slight advantage on second serve performance over the last six months. However, Agamenone's higher 46.78% return on opponents' second serves, compared to Darderi's 44.86%, indicates stronger return games, potentially offsetting the second serve deficit.

In the crucial area of breakpoints, Agamenone has demonstrated the ability to save 51.9% of breakpoints, while Darderi has saved 53.85%. Both players show resilience under pressure, which will be crucial for in-game strategies. Furthermore, when it comes to converting breakpoints, Agamenone holds a notable advantage, converting 34.05% of opportunities compared to Darderi’s 25%, a critical factor in live betting outcomes. Their differing styles and effectiveness on break points could shape the dynamics of the match.

The performance overview over the past year reveals that Agamenone has won 54.69% of his matches (W/L 35/29), whereas Darderi has a 46.77% win rate (W/L 29/33). Additionally, Agamenone has proven consistent on the Hard court, with a career win percentage of 59%, whereas Darderi excels on Clay with 63%. This variation in surface strengths could be pivotal depending on the current event's surface.

When assessing tournament levels, Agamenone has been predominantly competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a win rate of 50% (W/L 18/18), in contrast to Darderi’s 37.93% win rate (W/L 11/18) on the Main tour. This difference in competition level highlights the varying experiences each player brings to the match.

Opponent quality is another area of interest, where Agamenone has faced competitors with an average rank of 380.27 during the last 12 months, while Darderi has competed against a more challenging set of opponents with an average rank of 93.24. This disparity suggests Darderi may be used to a higher level of competition. In terms of deciding set performance, Darderi's 63% success rate surpasses Agamenone's 57%, suggesting that Darderi might have the upper hand should the match extend to a deciding set.

Overall, despite Agamenone's slight edge in certain statistics and surface proficiency, Darderi's experience against higher-ranked opponents and resilience in deciding sets slightly favors him to emerge victorious. With key stats like second serve performance, breakpoint conversion, and past competitive experience considered, Darderi is statistically favored to win this encounter. However, the dynamics of tennis can change rapidly, and both players are prepared for a competitive match.